<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Limit of God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kami.falseblue.com/2006/04/16/the-limit-of-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kami.falseblue.com/2006/04/16/the-limit-of-god/</link>
	<description>Religion, Rethought, Redefined, Restored</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:08:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: complich8</title>
		<link>http://kami.falseblue.com/2006/04/16/the-limit-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>complich8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 03:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kami.falseblue.com/2006/04/16/the-limit-of-god/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I think you should read George Berkeley&#039;s &quot;Principles of Knowledge&quot;, and/or read up on Leibniz&#039;s &quot;striving possibles&quot; theory.  They&#039;re neat, and relevant.  And Leibniz and Berkeley both present interesting representations of God, in which he&#039;s an absolute entity.  Being such, intercessory prayer is stupid and pointless, because God can&#039;t be changed.  If he intercedes, then for whatever reason it would be a flaw in his design that caused him to have to.

Berkeley in particular is a nice read ... because he&#039;s extremely organized, and extremely terse.

That&#039;s really it though.  If God intercedes in the world at all, in any way, then his perfect plan wasn&#039;t perfect, because he had to intercede.

(of course, there&#039;s arguments against that idea too, like &quot;but God&#039;s plan included that&quot; -- but those introduce the problem of determinism versus free will ... which is a whole other kettle of fish)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should read George Berkeley&#8217;s &#8220;Principles of Knowledge&#8221;, and/or read up on Leibniz&#8217;s &#8220;striving possibles&#8221; theory.  They&#8217;re neat, and relevant.  And Leibniz and Berkeley both present interesting representations of God, in which he&#8217;s an absolute entity.  Being such, intercessory prayer is stupid and pointless, because God can&#8217;t be changed.  If he intercedes, then for whatever reason it would be a flaw in his design that caused him to have to.</p>
<p>Berkeley in particular is a nice read &#8230; because he&#8217;s extremely organized, and extremely terse.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s really it though.  If God intercedes in the world at all, in any way, then his perfect plan wasn&#8217;t perfect, because he had to intercede.</p>
<p>(of course, there&#8217;s arguments against that idea too, like &#8220;but God&#8217;s plan included that&#8221; &#8212; but those introduce the problem of determinism versus free will &#8230; which is a whole other kettle of fish)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drdillo</title>
		<link>http://kami.falseblue.com/2006/04/16/the-limit-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>drdillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 01:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kami.falseblue.com/2006/04/16/the-limit-of-god/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>You sound so much like your father...its scary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sound so much like your father&#8230;its scary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
